Weather Control is Happening Right Now

Email Correspondence…

In case you missed this in todays Dompost.

I am a retired nurseryman and a gardener of many years.

This season besides the unusual weather in spring early summer there has been a further problem of shading caused by hazy blue skies and lack of direct sunlight.

This more often happens later in the day (when it does) and we have higher temperatures because the heat is trapped under the haze layer.

Yesterday I had the privilege of an 86 year old retired grower who has being monitoring the light levels for some years and his findings are that we are not getting the direct sunlight we used to get and his further research is that this is having a significant effect on crops and pasture/clover.

In my published weekly gardening articles I have being questioning about what is the haze and why at night one can usually only see the brightest starts and Venus and seldom see the milky way.

Because of my wide contact with gardeners through out NZ I am getting similar reports of plants seeking more light, stretching, a predominance of male flowers on cubits right through the season rather than just in the spring which is normal.

(Male flowers will be prominent when conditions are not favorable and when favorable the female flowers become dominate.)

Flowers not forming or forming and not opening, or opening but not fully. This is normal if there are not sufficient light levels.

It would appear that some areas of NZ are worse off than others in regards to haze and light levels.

Food crops are being effected.

————————————————————————

Re: YOUR INTERESTING EMAIL ABOUT TODAY’S ARTICLE ON WEATHER CONTROL, AND CHANGES IN LIGHT AFFECTING PLANT GROWTH IN NZ

You know much more about gardening than me, and your observations, with others throughout the country, about the profound changes taking place in plant growth through changes in light patterns are very interesting indeed.

A number of people believe these changes are being caused through US weather modification techniques through cloud seeding, chem-trails etc. However, although they do exist, I do not believe the changes to which you refer are caused by heat, moisture, dust or seeding particles in the atmosphere at all.

I believe they are being caused either by the US HAARP or Russian SURA ionospheric heating weapon facilities. which can transmit high power high frequency radio waves up into the ionosphere to heat it up and change the composition of magnetic field surrounding the earth thus causing extreme weather events and earthquakes. I think this is most probably NOT BEING PRODUCED BY THE US, but more likely by Russia, and not necessarily from even the Russian base near Vasilsursk near the nuclear weapon facility at Nizhniy Novgorod. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sura_Ionospheric_Heating_Facility

The Russians even from the days of the old Soviet Union were very advanced in electro-magnetic radiological weapon development, and first developed ionospheric weapons from over-the-horizon high powered radar transmission creating a ionospheric mirror in the ionosphere to reflect the waves over the horizon.

I believe when Vladimir Zhirinovsky said on Russian television, when everyone thought he was joking, that Russia now had a secret space weapon so powerful it could put an entire nation to sleep in 15 minutes on the other side of the world – HE WAS NOT KIDDING! – and is a modernization and redevelopment of the SURA system.

A number of Russian scientists actually believe now that they can manipulate the ionosphere, and therefore the magnetic fields surrounding the earth, to such an extent that the can now drive the earth off its axis.

I have been told recently by a leading German nuclear physicist who has worked for the Russian military and actually designed part of the International Space Station, that they have also been developing laser-induced plasma weather weapons as well which are much more powerful again, but at a lower atmospheric level.

I don’t know much about gardening and plant growth, but I do know a lot about light having written a book about it. If what you say about the changes in plant growth are correct, this is what I believe may be happening:

The ionosphere is a region of the earth’s upper atmosphere from about 60 km (37 miles) to 600 km (370 miles) up in altitude. Light is made up of electromagnetic particles which travel or radiate through space in waves at 299,792 km/sec (186,282 miles/second), commonly called the speed of light. The specific ENERGY of radiation waves depends on its wavelength and frequency. Wavelength is the distance between the tops (crests) of the waves. Frequency is the number of waves that pass by each second. The longer the wavelength of light, the lower the frequency and the less energy it contains. Simplified, the whole electromagnetic spectrum is divided up into different bands of radiation wavelength/frequencies, and the visible part of it to human eyesight is called the visible light spectrum. But it is only a very small part of the full electromagnetic spectrum.

The very short and powerful electromagnetic waves are Gamma waves, X-rays and Ultraviolet waves (which we can’t see) then there is the visible light spectrum which are the seven colors of the rainbow, violet, indigo, blue, green, yellow, orange, red – then even much longer, lower-powered wave lengths which we also can’t see, infrared, microwaves and radio waves.

Now, when the radiation from the sun travels towards earth, most of the really short wavelength powerful gamma rays and X-rays are blocked by the Van Allen Radiation Belts. The rest of the waves, because they are much longer wave lengths and lower frequency containing less energy then carry on to strike the ionosphere and then the atmosphere below it containing gas molecules where they are meticulously filtered and blocked again. The ionosphere is ionized solar radiation, or a shell of electrons and electrically charged atoms and molecules that surrounds the earth which creates a magnetic field of plasma. It owes its existence primarily from the X-ray, ultraviolet and shorter wavelength radiation from the sun.

Because the longer wavelengths and lower frequencies do not shatter or are filtered by this electrical field in the ionosphere, they carry on to provide day-light for everything to grow on earth. With one exception. Still a lot of the damaging ultraviolet wavelengths which we can’t see, and blue light wavelengths which we can see, carry on to strike the atmosphere. When the longer wavelengths green, yellow, orange and red wavelengths hit the atmosphere they are allowed to pass straight through. But the still potentially damaging shorter wavelengths, the ultraviolet and blue frequencies, because they are vibrating much more quickly when they hit the gas molecules in the atmosphere they largely shatter immediately and are blocked from continuing on to affect us here below. We can’t see the ultraviolet radiation that is filtered and blocked, but we can see the blue wavelengths that shatter, because they are shorter and are part of the visible light spectrum. – hence the reason why the sky is blue. Still a very small amount of ultraviolet and blue light is allowed to pass through the atmosphere to influence us all on earth, controlling the life cycles, circadian rhythms etc. of all plant and animal life across the globe.

If either the constitution of the ionosphere or atmosphere is manipulated, modified or changed for any reason, then this logically will dramatically start to change the amount, type and intensity of the radiation waves from the sun reaching the earth, and therefore it will affect the growth characteristics of every living thing, all plant and animal life. Since the ionosphere is the primary filter of the radiation from the sun, it stands to reason that any major change to it will have a much greater affect than even changes in the atmosphere. Potentially, it could even change they wavelength and frequency ranges of light reaching the earth, and therefore stop many plants from growing at all. Worse, it could happen without any of us knowing about the true cause.

So the real truth is it may not only be coming earthquakes that we will have to worry about!

Just my opinion!

But all a very interesting subject indeed.

————————————————————————

You are someone I respect deeply and may I say publicly – thank you for providing the Organic Crystal Sulfur (which is badly branded MSM). If folk are not familiar with this life (and mind) saving essential element, then do your families a favour get to studying the subject.

The UK has 65 % sunlight than it had on the 60 because of these programs. Id be interested to connect with this person taking the light readings to find out their metthods of data collection.

Yesterday NZs Stuff posted this article – programming for the masses. Note they say they may have to rather than they are already using these programs.

Scientists call for ‘geoengineering’ tests to find ways to cool the planet

http://thecontrail.com/forum/topics/stuff-nz-scientists-call-for-geoengineering-tests-to-find-ways-to?xg_source=activity

There was even a comment from the Heralds Jim Hopkins back in 2011 – some of them will shake the chains – but they quickly are shutup for their efforts.

Jim Hopkins: Reason and logic fall from the sky

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&objectid=10698214 from 2011

I approached tehn Kaikoura Mayor, Kevin Hayes in 2010 about the lines in the sky. Kevin went into bat for us sending 3 different letters to the Government after isiting the US and relating that back to the presentation I had shown him of Kaikoura skies. You can read the article. Click on the newspaper images to expand.

Bright Skies, Dark Motives – About Chemtrails In New Zealand, By Ben Vidgen

The ex Mayor now has a nice comfortable SHUT UP Job with ECAN. When I asked him if he was still batting for us, he simply responded, Rose, where am I going to get a salary like this at my age? At least he had the courage to be the ONLY leader in a elected role to step forward. he was bought off quiet honestly.

Wally, If you want to know about the ‘space fence’ that we now sit in purchase this $20 paperback which was written by one of my US members and pulls all the information together in a very readable book.

Chemtrails, Haarp, and the Full Spectrum Dominance of Planet Earth – Elana M. Freeland Join Elana’s Facebook Page

The following is not my opinion – it’s facts. If you go to the link provided at the bottom of the page, there is a ton of excellent documents for your perusal.

Geoengineering is defined as the deliberate large scale intervention in the Earth’s climate system for the stated goal of cooling the planet. Geoengineers are proposing spraying 10 to 20 million tons of toxic aluminum oxide and other particles into our atmosphere. While scientists claim that these programs are only in the planning stages, evidence is abundant that they have already been started. Several scientific groups have addressed various geoengineering techniques. Or area of interest and focus is on solar radiation management/stratospheric aerosol geoengineering. These methods are commonly referred to as chemtrails.

Solar radiation management/stratospheric aerosol geoengineering:

Solar Radiation Management (SRM) techniques, which reflect a small percentage of the sun’s light and heat back into space. These methods act quickly, and so may represent the only way to lower global temperatures quickly in the event of a climate crisis. However, they only reduce some, but not all, effects of what some scientists call the problem of climate change, while possibly creating other problems . They also do not affect CO2 levels and therefore fail to address the wider effects of rising CO2, including ocean acidification. Wether you believe in the man-made global worming theory, it is clear that geoengineers are planning on implementing these programs.

The Congressional Research Service released it new report on Geoengineering for members of the U.S. Congress on August 16, 2010. The U.S. House Science & Technology Committee released their Final Geoengineering Report on October 27, 2010. The U.S. House Science and Technology Committee on Geoengineering is working with the UK Parliament on Global Geoengineering Governance which has released its 5th Report (printed by the House of Commons), on March 10, 2010.

Click on the link below to read these reports:

http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org/content/geoengineering-c…

Many private corporations, universities, government agencies, private individuals, states, counties, and cities, have deployed or will participate in deploying, a vast array of geoengineering experiments in the near future without public oversight or consent. Currently no government agency, or the U.S. Congress at this time, will have any idea what the cumulative or synergistic effects may be when these experiments are deployed. In addition, no one, not even the U.S. Congress or the public, will have any oversight of these programs, the chemicals or particles that will be used or how they will be implemented. Thus, action is needed today to prevent these questionable experiments.

The U.S. House Science & Technology Committee and the UK Parliament have engaged in an agreement to participate in geoengineering discussions and the possible implementation of global geoengineering governance proposed by the Royal Society and several climate scientists. Private and public meetings of climate scientists, with little media coverage, were initiated in February and March 2010, in California, in order to elaborate on possible geoengineering schemes and to discuss global geoengineering governance guidelines.

The purpose of one set of schemes is to initiate “Solar Radiation Management (SRM)” experiments. SRM is designed to reduce the amount of direct sunlight reaching the Earth. The consequences of these SRM schemes are unknown since planetary-scale engineering involves so many different geoengineering schemes with unknown cumulative and synergistic effects.

A key AAAS February 2010, geoengineering write-up states: “…Studies show, however, that people make judgments based primarily on their values, belief systems, world views, and emotions. Facts play a much more minor role. This gap cannot be bridged by loading the public with facts, or trying to make the public more science literate…” Thus, a whole series of presentations were made to advise geoengineers and others on how to manipulate the public so that they would support these schemes.

In a Press Release Dated December of 2002 titled: “GEOENGINEERING TOO RISKY” A Lawrence Livermore Laboratory Press release warns, “…There are many reasons why geoengineering is not a preferred option for climate stabilization…” These prescriptions include risks of global “system failure” and the “unpredictable responses” of Earth’s climate system to large-scale human intervention…”

On March 22-26, 2010, the Climate Respond Fund (note the partners listing in the document section below), sponsored the Asilomar International Conference on Climate Intervention Technologies in Monterey, California.The conference was designed to develop (global geoengineering governance) guidelines for “…research and testing of proposed climate intervention and geoengineering technologies…”

What are the consequences of deploying Solar Radiation Management geoengineering experiments?

1) Some of these experiments are designed to reduce the amount of direct sunlight reaching the Earth thus reducing the power output and the effectiveness of solar panels and solar cars.

2) Many proposed chemicals or particles used in these geoengineering schemes (i.e., U.S. Navy/NASA C.A.R.E. experiment used a rocket to create an aluminum oxide dust cloud over the Eastern portion of the U.S. on September 19, 2009), are likely to be toxic to humans, marine mammals, oceans, fish, wildlife, food pollinators, and birds. Many of these toxic chemicals, like sulfur, have the potential to contaminate drinking water, soil, cause acid rain or air pollution, and may impair human health, from lack of Vitamin D, by reducing the amount of sunlight reaching the Earth.

3) NASA research studies show that increasingly persistent jet contrails may turn into “man-made clouds” (or white haze), and are “…trapping warmth in the atmosphere and exacerbating global warming…Any change in global cloud cover may contribute to long-term changes in the Earth’s climate…” No current U.S. legislation addresses water vapor and aviation impacts on the global atmosphere. In addition, our scientists do not appear to be funding or working toward reducing or eliminating this problem. What happens when additional programs are put in place to reduce the amount of sunlight reaching the Earth when we already have man-made clouds dimming the sun and exacerbating global warming?

4) SRM may limit Honey Bee food pollination because the bee navigates and communicates though the use of ultraviolet light. And we have no idea what the cumulative impacts of toxic chemicals, particles, and reduced sunlight will have on all of our pollinators endangering food production.

5) Photosynthesis is required for the majority of life on Earth to exist, along with healthy trees, and food crop production. When cloud cover and reduced sunlight is present crop production drops. When direct sunlight and normal rainfall is present crop production increases. What happens when geoengineers deliberate reduce the amount of direct sunlight reaching the Earth? What are the consequences of multiple uncontrolled experiments?

The climate scientists and geoengineers all have one repeated mantra: “…Geoengineering is not a solution to climate change and global warming…” They are instead enlisting support to spend enormous sums to buy time to do something later. Just what research, project funding, and development are they now engaging in to fix our current pollution problems now? Nothing! They are not promoting research into benefits that will be long-lasting or make a difference now.

The “temporary fix” theory with “unknown consequences” seems to be their only contribution to the disaster they predict. Should the public be willing to accept this temporary fix with unknown consequences? This attitude is unacceptable because those conducting the geoengineering experiments will be unaccountable if their experiments go awry or create profound negative consequences.

Professor Benford (U.C. Irvine, CA), wrote the following regarding the public in a Reason.com article in 1997:“…But perhaps the greatest unknown is social: How will the politically aware public react–those who vote, anyway? If geoengineers are painted early and often as Dr. Strangeloves of the air, they will fail. Properly portrayed as allies of science–and true environmentalism–they could become heroes… A major factor here will be whether mitigation looks like yet another top-down contrivance, another set of orders from the elite. Draconian policing of fuel burning will certainly look that way, a frowning Aunt Bessie elbowing into daily details…In contrast, mitigation does not have to push a new camel’s nose into our tents… Technical solutions can play out far from people’s lives, on the sea or high in the air…Once we become caretakers, we cannot stop…(they) must be carried forward in the shadow of our stewardship…”

Instead of questionable geoengineering experiments all reductions of greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants, at their source, should be regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency and all funding should go to the EPA for developing alternative energy and transportation. Scientists and researchers should be funded to invent ways to use waste energy from currently operating energy plants to produce clean, green power, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions is where funding should be directed…not to those programs and experiments that will not reduce our impact on Earth from various types of pollution sources. The energy of the geoengineers should be redirected to solve pollution problems not add to them.

On June 10, 2010, the U.S. Senate voted to uphold a 2007, U.S. Supreme Court Decision, that allows the EPA to regulated and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. There is no reason to initiate global geoengineering programs when we have the ability to reduce pollution under our laws. Reduction is the preferred alternative to pollution…not adding more toxic contaminates to our atmosphere that will impact life on Earth as we know it.

No one has the right to use the Earth, or Earth’s atmosphere, as a giant experimental physics laboratory due to the unknown consequences of such actions.

Wally, for official papers and more reading go to this link
http://thecontrail.com/forum/topics/geoengineering-info-official-reports?xg_source=activity

I hope this helps.

————————————————————————

You completed the picture beautifully!!!!!!!!!

Posted in News Tagged with: , , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*