RE: THEORY ANNA DURITSKAYA WAS A DECOY FOR MURDER OF BORIS NEMTSOV
Further to your outstanding, American, insightful, “lawyer’s mind,” female intuition and email below. I have got a feather to put in your little cap for your brilliant, intuitive analysis of the part Anna Duritskaya may probably have had in the slaying of Boris Nemtsov. Now more info has come out, I’ve got further weight to add to your perceptive observations that virtually PROVES you are right and that Anna Duritskaya was a “decoy” and definitely knows who actually killed her boyfriend.
Below you correctly mention it was extremely strange that they should meet for dinner at 11 pm, and then after dinner, walk home well over half a mile in the bitter cold to his apartment when he plainly would have preferred to take a cab, and that it must have been Anna who insisted she would rather walk, thus creating the perfect opportunity to assassinate him.
I have long known in court cases it is often quite simple for a good barrister to catch out people lying when family members are involved, especially if two members of the same family are testifying. I was involved in a town planning dispute many years ago in Auckland in trying to get a large childcare centre built (at the time the biggest in New Zealand) where the local council and Department of Education and Department of Social Welfare plus many local objectors were against my application with about 20 top gun lawyers representing them at the court hearing. Even though quite young at the time, and possessing an eternal hate of lawyers generally (as I still have by the way except you Cathy?????), I swallowed my pride and followed what I had read, that if you are not going to represent yourself which then I felt I couldn’t, you must get the best lawyer in the country to act for you, and I did, the top Queens Counsel in his field. Here is an example of what happened:
Two of the most serious objectors, Mr and Mrs Grey, were a husband and wife couple who lived next door who were objecting on the grounds of increased noise, a legitimate claim, and they in turn were supported by many others. Well this is what my QC said; Will Mrs Grey please take the stand? Thank you. Mrs Grey, I understand you are objecting against Mr Jack’s new childcare project on grounds of serious increases in noise from the centre affecting you and your husband. Is that correct? Yes it most definitely is correct Sir. Well, Mrs Grey, I can appreciate how distraught about the prospect you must feel. Can I ask you a question? Mrs Grey, do you work? Yes. What do you do? I am a nurse at Middlemore Hospital. What days do you work? Monday to Friday. What hours do you work? I work from 8 am to 5.30 pm. So when do you leave home in the morning and arrive home in the afternoon? I leave at 7.30 am and arrive home at about 6.30 pm. Well, Mrs Grey, are you aware that at 6.30 am in the morning and by 6.30 pm in the afternoon, there will be no children at the childcare centre as these are its opening and closing hours, and no noise will affect you at all. So with respect, Madam, it is really not you I presume, who is objecting but your husband? Well, Sir, I suppose that would be correct. Thank you Mrs Grey. You can step down, and I will now cross examine your husband.
Mr Grey, I understand you are objecting to Mr Jack’s proposed new childcare centre because of noise. Yes Sir I most definitely are. Do you work? Yes, I am a mobile crane operator. What hours do you work? Six days a week Monday to Saturday. When do you leave for work and arrive home? I leave at 5.30 am in the morning and usually arrive home about 7.30 or 8 pm. Are you aware, Mr Grey, that you will not be at home when the proposed childcare centre will be open? Yes. So then, Mr Grey, I presume it is only your wife that is at home being affected by the noise? Yes. That would be right Sir. Well, does she work too, like yourself, and what hours does she work? Oh, I don’t know the exact hours she works, but I think she is home most of the time during the week. Is that right Mr Grey? Are you sure you’re not lying to me? Why Sir? Well previously she told this court under cross examination she worked fulltime during the week and like yourself was not at all going to be affected by the increased noise from the centre at all. So I presume both you and your wife are no longer legitimate objectors on grounds of noise? Would that be fair to say Mr Grey? Well, Sir, since you put it that way, I suppose you might be right. Thank you Mr Grey. I will not be wanting to cross examine you any more. You and your wife are free to go home now. Next witness please!
SO, similarly, now we’ve got Boris Nemtsov’s girlfriend, Anna Duritskaya and her mother Inna Duritskaya BOTH testifying to the media, with stories that don’t add up!
When Inna Duritskaya was interviewed here: http://www.ibtimes.com/who-anna-duritskaya-boris-nemtsov-girlfriend-questioned-after-russian-opposition-1832678 she said, “she spoke to her daughter on the phone MOMENTS BEFORE Nemtsov’s death.”
Yet here, http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/03/europe/russia-nemtsov-girlfriend-duritskaya/ her daughter Anna Duritskaya makes a point to say that she suggested getting a taxi (???????), but Nemtsov didn’t want to, preferring to walk, and that she called her mother immediately AFTER Boris Nemtsov was shot.
Then in this report, (Cathy you will find this incredible with hindsight after your email) http://www.sott.net/article/293301-Nemtsov-murder-witness-Anna-Duritskaya-tells-mom-he-insisted-on-walking-to-apartment Anna’s mother Inna Duritskaya actually talks to CNN, saying her daughter told her she arrived separately and waited for Boris in the restaurant. She told her mother that Boris INSISTED ON WALKING BY FOOT to his apartment. Question: Why should Boris “INSIST” to walk on foot through the freezing temperature back to the apartment if she had asked him to take a taxi as she suggests?
Clearly Anna Duritskaya is lying. Clearly it was she who phoned Boris to meet her for dinner at the restaurant, and it also was SHE who INSISTED that they walk back together to his apartment together, so that he could be assassinated
Anna Duritskaya KNOWS who murdered her partner because she was the decoy to have him killed. The Russians have interviewed and cross examined her for three days before letting her go back to Kiev. They will have all her phone and email records, financial records about her by now and they probably know or are at least close to knowing who killed him. If anything, it will be her phone that lets her down, as young people like her may know not to use it in such circumstances, but the temptation is irresistible, therefore it will be her downfall!
Both Boris’s and her own telephone records will be easily available and it will be easy for Russian authorities to verify exactly who made the booking at the restaurant, who telephoned to make the appointment and so on.
Interesting isn’t it?
BORIS NEMTSOV MURDER
I know I don’t often comment much but I will on this one. I was so appreciative of you sending me a copy of that email from your friend in Moscow, as I agree with him 100 per cent! I have never told you my mother was Russian so I especially have a deep interest in what’s going on there and in Ukraine. Here is some typical British propaganda about the event: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/murdered-russian-politician-boris-nemtsovs-5255998 If you read this bull%%#& about Nemtsov’s young girlfriend Anna Duritskaya supposedly “being terrified of Putin” you will believe anything!
Jack, I don’t mind admitting, at first when I started to receive your emails over 5 years ago I literally thought you were crazy, especially about the incredible global power of the fascist British oligarchy and the City of London having been brought up almost from childhood to believe the Vatican controls everything which it now clearly doesn’t – and I nearly asked you to remove my name from your email list. But now with the benefit of hindsight, I am truly so appreciative of your work, and it is beginning to get much clearer for me, although I admit it is very insidious and difficult to understand for most. It’s only when you come to realize almost all our news is now heavily censored in the West and has been for at least the past 100 years or so, that you begin to realize who the real arch criminals really are, namely our own, and with the current events in Ukraine, certainly not Russia.
I mean, all the western media swamp rats including global television attempting to make Boris Nemtsov out to be “a great honest man who had Russia’s future and democracy at heart” when the truth is he was the most corrupt, Jewish, pro-western neo-fascist who has spent most of his life %#&!ing as many young women as he could find, with no loyalty to anyone not even his own family, his three former wives, with ties to Israel, Mossad, Jewish bankers and the Russian mafia. This article here gives you a little bit about his sexual life. Nemtsov was 55 and his current girlfriend Ms Anna Duritskaya at age 23 was young enough to be his granddaughter. Basically the scumbag had the morals of an alley cat and was simply a common opportunist with no loyalty to Russia or the Russian people at all. Only himself.
I have taken time off work today to do some of my own research and you might be shocked by this. One of our leading Western puppet writers in the US attacking Putin over the murder of Boris Nemtsov right now is Amy W. Knight, one of America’s top historians of the KGB, Soviet Union and Russia. In fact she is extensively quoted in this Christian Science Monitor article titled Who was Boris Nemtsov and why was he murdered? by Lisa Suhay yesterday: http://news.yahoo.com/boris-nemtsov-why-murdered-194722631.html
If you read this article, you will see that Amy Knight actually says that “she barely slept Friday night after hearing of the death of Nemtsov, whose work she has edited for American publication and has worked with via telephone.” “This is a man with whom I have spoken many times over the phone.” The article continues; “Ms Knight has a PhD in Russian politics at the London School of Economic and Political Science (LSE)”.
So here, out of her very own mouth, she openly admits that Boris Nemtsov was actually secretly working for her who edited his work for American publication, effectively making her a British agent, who not only is a graduate of the British Fabian Society’s fascist London School of Economics linked to Chatham House that controls the political affairs of much of the world including the CFR here, she has also lectured at the LSE as well.
Way back on November 20, 2014, this writer at LiveLeak.com also picked up on the fact that Amy Knight was in fact a leading blatant anti-Putin propaganda writer. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=dab_1417176682
Lastly, here is a report about Boris Nemtsov’s tangled love life and his relationship with his 23 year old Ukrainian girl friend Anna Duritskaya: http://observer.com/2015/03/ukrainian-girlfriend-of-slain-russian-key-to-the-case/ I would agree with your Russian emailer that Putin has nothing to do with the murder, would say there is a 99% chance it was an Anglo/American military intelligence operation, but still I think a 1% chance it could have been an assassination connected directly to Nemtsov’s girlfriend. Why I say this, is apparently she had just returned from Ukraine after having had an abortion. Who she met there and how she felt about the abortion and Nemtsov’s part in it we don’t know.
According to this report here, the couple had dinner at a mall at around 11 pm then left some time later to walk home in the freezing mid-winter temperatures over half a mile away to Nemtsov’s apartment. This is very late to have dinner at this time of the night during the week, in the middle of winter, and then for a 55-year-old to walk home in the freezing temperature without taking a taxi, and points to Anna being the one wanting to walk, not Nemtsov. This late time of the night would have thus been perfect timing for an assassination attempt when they were alone out in the open, as very few people and not much traffic around. Personally, I think young Anna Duritskaya is deeply involved and she was used as a decoy to get him out in the open. Apparently six shots were fired, four hit Nemtsov and Anna Duritskaya was completely unharmed. While it is true their phones could have been tapped to monitor their whereabouts, other than that, Anna probably would have been the only one that knew the exact time of the dinner and the eventual path they would take walking home. Yes, I think she knows much more than she’s letting on!
As expected on today’s TV News, there were still a few thousand of the Russian sheep, no different than our own, marching in the streets in support of Nemtsov, even in Russia, so it just goes to show how naive and ignorant most people are, irrespective of nationality. Whether the West’s propaganda like this will work in trying to get rid of Putin I don’t know. Soon time will tell.
However, from my point of view Jack, I can accept any marriage, or a civil partnership breaking down as it can happen to anyone. But for a man in his political capacity to claim he has the democratic future of his country at heart, while repudiating all three former wives, his own family and children, and continue on to deliberately spend as much of his time as possible indiscriminately preying on and %#&&ing young women like this, (irrespective of anything else) with no loyalty to anyone other than himself, he is, what your friend in Moscow quite correctly calls nothing less than common “scum” and I believe he really got his just deserts – and was certainly not fit to be a leader.
Keep up the great work Jack, and hope I’ve helped add a little bit more to the true picture.
As you say, amazing, momentous times!